Apigee proxy estates grow by copy-paste. Once the same authentication, logging, and error-handling policies exist in hundreds of independently maintained bundles, a single security change becomes a hundreds-of-pull-requests project.
A required change to token validation had to be applied to every proxy individually, and the team could not confirm it had been applied consistently. Error responses varied across proxies, so client teams handled failures differently depending on which API they called. There was no shared flow strategy and no naming or versioning convention.
Apigee X with proxies owned by multiple product teams, fronting internal services and partner-facing APIs under financial-services security requirements.
AceMQ analyzed the proxy bundles as source code, clustering near-identical policy blocks to quantify duplication and identify the natural shared flow boundaries. The output was a target shared flow architecture plus a refactoring sequence that could be executed incrementally without a freeze.
Security-relevant policy changes became a single shared flow update instead of a per-proxy campaign, and client teams got consistent error semantics across the API surface.
Planning and executing a migration from Apigee Edge to Apigee X, including the policy, networking, and analytics differences that break naive lift-and-shift.
Designing a Kong topology for a company consolidating several ad-hoc API entry points, including control plane separation and environment promotion.
Whether you need architecture advisory, 24/7 support, or full managed services, AceMQ has the expertise to help.