Emergency Incident Response
Cache down, writes rejected, or a cluster stuck mid-reshard with production traffic on it. A senior engineer joins a live bridge within 15 minutes with access to diagnose — not a ticket acknowledgement.
Tanzu Valkey Support
Last reviewed by Scott Sternloff
AceMQ is Broadcom's VMware Expert Advantage Partner of the Year for the Americas. Valkey inherits Redis's operational surface exactly — fork stalls during RDB snapshots, transparent huge pages wrecking tail latency, evictions that never fire, replicas resyncing in a loop. Our engineers have been debugging that surface since long before the fork, and every ticket reaches a named senior engineer who knows your topology.
Planning a build, upgrade or migration instead? See AceMQ Valkey consulting and services.
Customers




Partners


Incident Triage
These are real symptoms from real Valkey production environments — and the first thing our engineers check when one comes in.
| Symptom you're seeing | What we check first | Typical resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Periodic latency spikes of hundreds of milliseconds that line up with the save schedule | latest_fork_usec in INFO against the RDB and AOF-rewrite schedule. Fork cost scales with page-table size, not dataset size, and the fork blocks the single event loop — so a large instance can stall every client for half a second on a schedule nobody remembers setting. | Under 2 hours |
| Tail latency far worse than the dataset size should produce, with no obvious cause | Transparent huge pages at the OS level. THP inflates copy-on-write cost after a fork by orders of magnitude, and it is enabled by default on most distributions — this is a one-line host change that resolves latency problems teams have chased for months. | Under 1 hour |
| Writes rejected with an OOM error while memory usage looks like it should be evicting | maxmemory-policy against actual TTL coverage on the keyspace. noeviction rejects writes by design, and volatile-* policies only consider keys that carry a TTL — with mostly persistent keys there is nothing eligible to evict, so the instance fills and stops accepting writes. | Under 1 hour |
| Replicas repeatedly disconnect and fall back to a full resync | client-output-buffer-limit for the replica class and repl-backlog-size against your write throughput. If the replica's output buffer overruns mid-sync the primary drops it, and the resulting full resync generates yet more write load — a loop that gets worse under exactly the traffic that triggered it. | 1–3 hours |
| Cluster resharding stuck with slots left in migrating or importing state | CLUSTER SETSLOT state on both source and target plus the keys still open in the slot. A large collection key migrated with too short a timeout leaves the slot half-moved, and the cluster stays in that state until the slot is explicitly resolved on both ends — retrying the reshard makes it worse. | 2–4 hours |
| One node's CPU pegged at 100% on modest operations per second | SLOWLOG and LATENCY HISTORY, then keyspace notification config and pattern subscriptions. A KEYS scan, an SMEMBERS over a large set, or a broad psubscribe fan-out all run on the event loop, so one expensive client can saturate a node the metrics say is barely loaded. | Under 2 hours |
| Reported memory far above the sum of stored key sizes | mem_fragmentation_ratio and allocator statistics. Fragmentation after a large eviction or expiry wave leaves jemalloc holding pages it cannot return — activedefrag tuning usually fixes it, but the ratio also has to be read correctly, because a value under 1.0 means swapping and is a much more urgent problem. | 1–3 hours |
Resolution times reflect typical Valkey engagements under an active AceMQ support contract. Every P1 closes with a written root-cause analysis.
What's Included
No add-on pricing for incidents. No per-ticket charges. One contract covers the whole surface.
Cache down, writes rejected, or a cluster stuck mid-reshard with production traffic on it. A senior engineer joins a live bridge within 15 minutes with access to diagnose — not a ticket acknowledgement.
Every P1 closes with a written RCA: what failed, why, the fix applied, and the persistence, eviction, or host-level change that prevents recurrence. Delivered as standard, not on request.
Fork and persistence strategy, THP and kernel parameters, eviction policy against real TTL coverage, fragmentation and defrag settings, hot key detection, and client-side pooling and pipelining.
Slot distribution and resharding, replica placement, Sentinel or cluster failover timing verified by actual chaos testing rather than assumed, and zero-downtime node addition and removal.
Command and protocol compatibility assessment, client SDK verification, RDB-based data movement with key-level validation, and cutover with traffic shadowing and a rehearsed rollback.
As Broadcom's Expert Advantage Partner of the Year, we handle Tanzu Valkey subscription questions alongside the technical ones: entitlement reconciliation, true-up exposure, renewal terms, and quotes inside 24 hours.
Why AceMQ
AceMQ holds Broadcom's top VMware partner award for the Americas in 2025. That gives you an escalation path into Tanzu engineering for genuine product defects, and one team handling both your support and your Valkey subscription.
The same senior engineers stay on your account. They know your shard layout, your persistence choice, and your access pattern — so a P1 starts with diagnosis instead of you describing your topology while writes are failing.
You reach a senior Valkey engineer directly by phone, email, or Slack. No help desk collecting information to pass along, no escalation approval between you and someone who can read a LATENCY report.
Most Valkey latency problems are kernel problems: transparent huge pages, overcommit settings, swap, NUMA placement, or a noisy neighbour on shared storage. We diagnose down to the host, because that is where the answer usually is.
Engineers across 26+ countries and every time zone. Your 3am eviction storm is someone's mid-afternoon — no overnight skeleton crew, no waiting for a region to wake up.
Quarterly health checks plus shared intelligence across our support base. When a version-specific bug surfaces on one customer's cluster, every affected customer hears about it before it reaches their production.
Cloud, Kubernetes, bare metal, hybrid, and air-gapped — including environments where you can't give us outbound network access.
Escalation Path
Every tier reaches a senior Valkey engineer. There is no tier-1 triage layer to get through.
P1 escalation path
A replay of one P1, from the first page to the written root-cause analysis
15-minute P1 response, 24/7.
A response time, not a resolution time.
P1 opened, on-call engineer paged
Phone, email or Slack reaches the on-call senior engineer directly, whether the incident is in RabbitMQ, Kafka, Redis, PostgreSQL or Kubernetes. No web form, no tier-1 queue.
Senior engineer on your bridge
A senior engineer who already knows your environment joins a live bridge, so nobody has to re-explain your topology.
Specialists across the stack join
When an incident crosses components, the engineers who know each one join. For RabbitMQ, the path runs to the core team.
Written root-cause analysis
Root cause, the fix applied and the prevention steps, delivered after every P1.
Pricing
AceMQ Valkey support contracts typically run $24,000–72,000 a year, depending on SLA level, scope (number of clusters or nodes, and environments) and deployment (self-managed, cloud-managed or Kubernetes).
| What moves the price | How it changes the contract |
|---|---|
| SLA level | Business-hours cover costs less than 24/7 cover with a 15-minute emergency response. |
| Scope | More clusters or nodes, and more environments, make a larger contract. |
| Deployment | Self-managed, cloud-managed and Kubernetes estates need different amounts of hands-on work. |
Covering several technologies under one contract, for example RabbitMQ, Kafka and Redis, earns an aggressive discount.
Support In Practice
Valkey support, migration and patching work from AceMQ. Each card links to the full write-up: the Valkey estate, what AceMQ diagnosed or changed, and the result.
Digital Collaboration Platform
A production Redis cluster was crashing under memory growth traced to its full-text index rather than to the workload. AceMQ diagnosed the leak, stabilized the cluster, and mapped the Valkey migration path.
Regional Payments Processor
A Valkey Cluster resharding ahead of a seasonal peak stalled with slots left in migrating and importing states. AceMQ resolved the slots on both nodes, finished the move in controlled batches and set up support for the next one.
Benefits Administration Provider
A regulated provider could not move its on-premises Valkey 7.2 clusters for another year. AceMQ assessed each security advisory against its configuration and backported the fixes through OSSeva.
European Telecom Operator
A telecom operator wanted to move its Redis estate to Valkey but did not know which instances could move cleanly. AceMQ assessed commands, scripts, modules and clients instance by instance and ordered the migration.
Support options
AceMQ offers Tanzu Valkey support in four tiers, each handing more of the day-to-day work to AceMQ: 24/7 support and incident management for Valkey your team runs, proactive monitoring that catches fork, memory and failover problems first, managed Valkey on your own infrastructure, and fully managed Valkey on AceMQ infrastructure. Valkey 7.2 to 9.1 are covered in all four, with VMware Tanzu licensing for US customers.
You run it, we back you up
Best for: Teams that run Tanzu for Valkey or open source Valkey themselves and need senior cover at 3am.
You run it, we watch it with you
Best for: Estates where intermittent latency or a stuck failover is an outage waiting for a trigger.
We run it in your cloud or data centre
Best for: Regulated teams that must keep Valkey inside their own boundary but do not want it on their own rota.
We host it and run it, as a service
Best for: Teams that want Valkey, or a move off Redis, without staffing a platform rota.
| Who does what | Tier 1 24/7 support | Tier 2 Proactive monitoring | Tier 3 Managed, your infrastructure | Tier 4 Fully managed by AceMQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who runs Valkey day to day? | Your team | Your team, with AceMQ reviews | AceMQ | AceMQ |
| Where does it run? | Your infrastructure | Your infrastructure | Your cloud account or data centre | AceMQ infrastructure |
| 24/7 incident response | 15-minute P1 response | 15-minute P1 response | 15-minute P1 response | 15-minute P1 response |
| Health checks and CVE alerts | On request | Scheduled | Included | Included |
| Patching and upgrades | Your team, AceMQ advises | Planned with AceMQ | Done by AceMQ | Done by AceMQ |
| Monitoring and on-call | Your team | Your team | AceMQ | AceMQ |
| Data, keys and accounts | Yours | Yours | Yours | Your data, hosted by AceMQ |
Every Tier can start as an ad hoc engagement or an annual partnership, and you can move up or down a Tier as your team changes.
One partner for Valkey
Support is one part of what AceMQ does for Valkey. The same engineers deliver consulting, health checks, migrations and end-of-life cover, and support the systems that usually run next to it.
Our Tanzu Valkey support covers 24/7 emergency incident response with a 15-minute SLA, root cause analysis on every P1, latency and memory tuning, cluster and failover operations, Redis-to-Valkey migration, version upgrades, and Broadcom licensing support. Every ticket is handled by a named senior engineer assigned to your account. There is no tier-1 triage layer and no per-incident charge.
Operationally, yes — and that is the point. Valkey forked from Redis 7.2, so the failure modes, the INFO fields, the persistence mechanics, the cluster slot model, and the kernel interactions are the same ones engineers have been debugging for a decade. Divergence so far is mostly in newer features and threading work rather than in the surface that breaks at 3am. We track the differences that matter and tell you when one applies to your case.
P1 emergencies — instance down, writes rejected, cluster unavailable — get a 15-minute first response with a senior engineer joining a live bridge. P2 critical issues are 1 hour, P3 high-priority 4 hours, and P4 standard questions next business day. These are contractual, not best-effort targets.
In most cases, yes. We start with a compatibility assessment across your command usage, Lua scripts, module dependencies, and client SDK versions, because that is where surprises live rather than in the data itself. Migration then runs as replication or RDB transfer with key-level validation, followed by a shadowed cutover with a rehearsed rollback. Deployments using modules that have no Valkey equivalent are the exception, and we identify those in the assessment rather than mid-cutover.
That is the most common Valkey engagement we take. Intermittent spikes almost always trace to something periodic rather than something load-driven: a fork for an RDB snapshot or AOF rewrite, transparent huge pages amplifying copy-on-write, an expiry wave, or a scheduled client running an expensive command. We correlate LATENCY HISTORY, SLOWLOG, fork timings, and host-level metrics on a single timeline, which usually turns an unreproducible problem into a schedule.
Yes. As Broadcom's VMware Expert Advantage Partner of the Year for the Americas, we size Tanzu Valkey subscriptions against your deployed node and core counts, reconcile them with purchased entitlements, flag true-up exposure before an audit does, and negotiate renewal and multi-year terms. Licensing quotes come back within 24 hours, from the same team that sizes your cluster.
Yes. AceMQ works on Valkey in two ways: ad hoc engagements for a defined piece of work, such as a health check, an upgrade or an incident, or an annual partner engagement that covers 24/7 support, proactive reviews and named engineers. Many teams start ad hoc and move to an annual partnership once the first engagement is done.
Every AceMQ proposal is tailored to your requirements: your Valkey environment, the SLA you need, the hours of cover and the scope of work. Most contracts run $24,000–72,000 a year, depending on the SLA, the scope and how Valkey is deployed, with aggressive discounts when several technologies share one contract. Request a quote and AceMQ replies within 1 hour.
Let's talk
Reactive cover, proactive reviews, or AceMQ running Valkey for you on your infrastructure or ours. A senior engineer scopes it with you, and quote requests are answered within 1 hour.
Production incident right now?Email a Valkey Architect
Send us a message and we'll follow up within 1 hour — or book a free 30-min consultation directly.
305-204-2607info@acemq.comPrefer to talk now? Call us directly or use the consultation tab to find a time that works.