Emergency Incident Response
A broker runs low on disk, leadership flaps cluster-wide, or producers stop flowing. A senior engineer joins a live bridge within 15 minutes with direct access to diagnose — not a ticket acknowledgement.
Redpanda Support
Last reviewed by Scott Sternloff
AceMQ supports Redpanda in production — brokers running low on disk from tiered storage misconfiguration, Raft group leadership flapping under network instability, and client libraries that assume Kafka-specific broker behavior Redpanda doesn't replicate exactly. Every ticket reaches a named senior engineer who already knows your cluster topology.
Planning a build, upgrade or migration instead? See AceMQ Redpanda consulting and services.
Customers




Partners


Incident Triage
These are real symptoms from real Redpanda production environments — and the first thing our engineers check when one comes in.
| Symptom you're seeing | What we check first | Typical resolution |
|---|---|---|
| A broker's local disk fills up despite tiered storage being enabled | Tiered storage upload lag against local retention settings. Local retention configured too high relative to actual upload throughput to object storage means data accumulates locally faster than it's offloaded. | 1–2 hours |
| Partition leadership keeps flapping between brokers | Raft group election timeouts against actual inter-broker network latency and packet loss. Aggressive election timeouts tuned for a stable network will trigger unnecessary re-elections under any network jitter. | 1–3 hours |
| A Kafka client library throws errors or behaves inconsistently against Redpanda | Which specific broker-side behavior the client assumes — often around transactional semantics, certain admin API edge cases, or timestamp handling — that Redpanda implements to spec but not bit-for-bit identically to Kafka. | 2–4 hours |
| Consumer group rebalances repeatedly, throughput collapses during it | Consumer session timeout and heartbeat interval against actual processing time per poll. A consumer whose processing loop exceeds max.poll.interval.ms gets evicted and re-triggers a rebalance for the entire group — this is protocol-level behavior shared with Kafka. | 1–2 hours |
| A WASM data transform fails or stops processing records | Transform runtime logs and resource limits. WASM transforms run in a sandboxed environment per broker core, and a transform that panics or exceeds its memory budget silently stops processing the partition it's attached to. | 2–4 hours |
| Cluster throughput is far below expected despite adequate hardware | Core allocation against seastar's thread-per-core model. Redpanda pins one shard per core, so a mismatch between configured core count, actual CPU allocation, and partition count leaves cores idle while others are saturated. | 1–3 hours |
| Migrating from Kafka and a producer/consumer stopped working post-cutover | Client compatibility mode settings and API version negotiation. Certain Kafka client configurations that rely on broker-specific quirks need adjustment, which is exactly why we run compatibility testing before cutover rather than after. | Same day |
Resolution times reflect typical Redpanda engagements under an active AceMQ support contract. Every P1 closes with a written root-cause analysis.
What's Included
No add-on pricing for incidents. No per-ticket charges. One contract covers the whole surface.
A broker runs low on disk, leadership flaps cluster-wide, or producers stop flowing. A senior engineer joins a live bridge within 15 minutes with direct access to diagnose — not a ticket acknowledgement.
Every P1 closes with a written RCA: what failed, why, the fix applied, and the specific config or code change that prevents recurrence.
Thread-per-core allocation, partition-to-core alignment, and tiered storage retention tuned against your actual hardware and throughput profile — not generic defaults.
Testing and guidance on which Kafka client behaviors Redpanda replicates exactly and which need adjustment, before those gaps surface as a production incident.
Quarterly reviews of tiered storage upload lag, local disk headroom, and partition growth so you size ahead of demand rather than reacting to a full disk.
Migration planning and execution from Kafka to Redpanda, including client compatibility testing, protocol validation, and canary cutover with rollback plans.
Why AceMQ
The same senior engineers stay on your account. They know your cluster topology, your partition layout, and which client libraries you run — so a P1 starts with diagnosis, not twenty minutes of explaining your environment.
You reach a senior Redpanda engineer directly by phone, email, or Slack. No help desk collecting information to pass along, no escalation approval process standing between you and someone who can fix it.
The Kafka-API compatibility is real but not total. We know precisely which broker behaviors, admin API edge cases, and transactional semantics differ, which matters more when your client libraries assume Kafka specifics.
Engineers across 26+ countries and every time zone. Your 3am leadership-flap incident is someone's mid-afternoon — no overnight skeleton crew, no waiting for a region to wake up.
Quarterly health checks on tiered storage lag and core utilization, plus shared intelligence across our support base. When a version-specific issue surfaces on one customer's cluster, every affected customer hears about it before it reaches their production.
We won't oversell operational simplicity as a reason to migrate if your actual pain points are elsewhere. We diagnose whether Redpanda genuinely solves your specific Kafka operational burden before recommending a migration.
Cloud, Kubernetes, bare metal, hybrid, and air-gapped — including environments where you can't give us outbound network access.
Escalation Path
Every tier reaches a senior Redpanda engineer. There is no tier-1 triage layer to get through.
P1 escalation path
A replay of one P1, from the first page to the written root-cause analysis
15-minute P1 response, 24/7.
A response time, not a resolution time.
P1 opened, on-call engineer paged
Phone, email or Slack reaches the on-call senior engineer directly, whether the incident is in RabbitMQ, Kafka, Redis, PostgreSQL or Kubernetes. No web form, no tier-1 queue.
Senior engineer on your bridge
A senior engineer who already knows your environment joins a live bridge, so nobody has to re-explain your topology.
Specialists across the stack join
When an incident crosses components, the engineers who know each one join. For RabbitMQ, the path runs to the core team.
Written root-cause analysis
Root cause, the fix applied and the prevention steps, delivered after every P1.
Pricing
AceMQ Redpanda support contracts typically run $24,000–72,000 a year, depending on SLA level, scope (number of clusters or nodes, and environments) and deployment (self-managed, cloud-managed or Kubernetes).
| What moves the price | How it changes the contract |
|---|---|
| SLA level | Business-hours cover costs less than 24/7 cover with a 15-minute emergency response. |
| Scope | More clusters or nodes, and more environments, make a larger contract. |
| Deployment | Self-managed, cloud-managed and Kubernetes estates need different amounts of hands-on work. |
Covering several technologies under one contract, for example RabbitMQ, Kafka and Redis, earns an aggressive discount.
Support In Practice
Redpanda support, remediation and assessment work from AceMQ. Each card links to the full write-up: the cluster, what AceMQ diagnosed or changed, and the result.
Smart Grid Technology Provider
Evaluating whether a proposed streaming workload belongs on Flink, and what the exactly-once, state, and operational requirements will really cost.
Connected Device Platform Provider
Designing tiered storage for long retention so historical data lives in object storage without local disk dictating how long you can keep it.
Online Gaming Platform
Resolving produce and consume latency spikes traced to Raft leadership imbalance, disk saturation, and partition distribution across brokers.
Healthcare Analytics Provider
Named-engineer 24/7 support for Redpanda clusters covering node recovery, consumer lag incidents, upgrades, and client-side failures.
Global Payments Processor
Migrating from Kafka to Redpanda with client compatibility testing, ACL and schema registry translation, and a staged cutover per topic.
Support options
AceMQ offers Redpanda support in four tiers, each handing more of the day-to-day work to AceMQ: 24/7 support and incident management for clusters your team runs, proactive monitoring that catches disk, leadership and CVE problems first, managed Redpanda on your own infrastructure, and fully managed Redpanda on AceMQ infrastructure. Self-managed clusters and, above the managed layer, Redpanda Cloud are covered in all four.
You run it, we back you up
Best for: Teams that run Redpanda themselves and need senior cover at 3am.
You run it, we watch it with you
Best for: Clusters where a full disk or a leadership shuffle is not an acceptable surprise.
We run it in your cloud or data centre
Best for: Regulated estates that must keep streaming data inside their own boundary.
We host it and run it, as a service
Best for: Teams that want Kafka-protocol streaming without owning a cluster, a cloud account or a rota.
| Who does what | Tier 1 24/7 support | Tier 2 Proactive monitoring | Tier 3 Managed, your infrastructure | Tier 4 Fully managed by AceMQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who runs Redpanda day to day? | Your team | Your team, with AceMQ reviews | AceMQ | AceMQ |
| Where does it run? | Your infrastructure | Your infrastructure | Your cloud account or data centre | AceMQ infrastructure |
| 24/7 incident response | 15-minute P1 response | 15-minute P1 response | 15-minute P1 response | 15-minute P1 response |
| Health checks and CVE alerts | On request | Scheduled | Included | Included |
| Patching and upgrades | Your team, AceMQ advises | Planned with AceMQ | Done by AceMQ | Done by AceMQ |
| Monitoring and on-call | Your team | Your team | AceMQ | AceMQ |
| Data, keys and accounts | Yours | Yours | Yours | Your data, hosted by AceMQ |
Every Tier can start as an ad hoc engagement or an annual partnership, and you can move up or down a Tier as your team changes.
One partner for Redpanda
Support is one part of what AceMQ does for Redpanda. The same engineers deliver consulting, health checks, migrations and end-of-life cover, and support the systems that usually run next to it.
Our Redpanda support covers 24/7 emergency incident response with a 15-minute SLA, root cause analysis on every P1, seastar and core tuning, client compatibility advisory, quarterly capacity reviews, and Kafka migration support. Every ticket is handled by a named senior engineer — there is no tier-1 triage layer and no per-incident charge.
Yes. We support Redpanda Cloud (BYOC and Dedicated) alongside self-managed deployments on Kubernetes, VMs, or bare metal. The managed variant removes infrastructure operations but not client compatibility, partition design, or WASM transform issues — those are still where most incidents originate.
Yes. This is one of the most common Redpanda support requests we get. Redpanda implements the Kafka protocol to spec, but certain broker-side behaviors — particularly around transactional edge cases, admin API responses, and timestamp handling — aren't bit-for-bit identical. We identify the specific divergence and either adjust the client configuration or the Redpanda-side setting causing it.
P1 emergencies — a broker down, leadership flapping cluster-wide, or producers not flowing — get a 15-minute first response with a senior engineer joining a live bridge. P2 critical issues are 1 hour, P3 high-priority 4 hours, and P4 standard questions next business day. These are contractual, not best-effort targets.
Yes. We plan and execute Kafka-to-Redpanda migrations, including client compatibility testing before cutover — not after — protocol-level validation, and a canary cutover with a rollback plan. We'll also tell you honestly if your specific Kafka pain points won't actually be solved by the migration.
Yes. We troubleshoot WASM transform failures, including transforms that panic or exceed their per-core resource budget and silently stop processing a partition, which is a Redpanda-specific failure mode with no Kafka equivalent.
Redpanda is a streaming data platform from Redpanda Data that implements the Kafka API, so existing producers, consumers and Kafka Connect pipelines work against it without code changes. Underneath it is different: written in C++ with a thread-per-core architecture, no JVM and no ZooKeeper, and Raft-based replication built in. That changes what operations look like. There is no heap to tune and no controller quorum to run separately, but partition limits are tied to cores and memory, Tiered Storage moves older data to object storage, and the upgrade path moves one release at a time. Our support covers the Redpanda-specific parts as well as the Kafka-compatible surface your applications see.
A P1, meaning a cluster down, under-replicated partitions blocking producers, or data loss suspected, gets a senior engineer on a live call within 15 minutes, around the clock. After the incident you get a written root cause analysis. Between incidents the contract covers what prevents downtime: monitoring and alerting on disk headroom, replication and consumer lag, review of the deployment on Kubernetes or bare metal, sizing for partition counts and Tiered Storage, and rehearsed sequential upgrades so the cluster stays inside Redpanda's 12-month support window. Redpanda Cloud and BYOC clusters on AWS, Azure or GCP are covered for everything above the managed layer, which is where most pipeline problems actually live.
Yes. AceMQ works on Redpanda in two ways: ad hoc engagements for a defined piece of work, such as a health check, an upgrade or an incident, or an annual partner engagement that covers 24/7 support, proactive reviews and named engineers. Many teams start ad hoc and move to an annual partnership once the first engagement is done.
Every AceMQ proposal is tailored to your requirements: your Redpanda environment, the SLA you need, the hours of cover and the scope of work. Most contracts run $24,000–72,000 a year, depending on the SLA, the scope and how Redpanda is deployed, with aggressive discounts when several technologies share one contract. Request a quote and AceMQ replies within 1 hour.
Let's talk
Reactive cover, proactive reviews, or AceMQ running Redpanda for you on your infrastructure or ours. A senior engineer scopes it with you, and quote requests are answered within 1 hour.
Production incident right now?Email a Redpanda Architect
Send us a message and we'll follow up within 1 hour — or book a free 30-min consultation directly.
305-204-2607info@acemq.comPrefer to talk now? Call us directly or use the consultation tab to find a time that works.