Comparison · Support

Kong Alternatives and Competitors Compared

Teams look for Kong alternatives for three reasons: a licence question on newer Gateway versions, a move to the Kubernetes Gateway API, or a wish to run one gateway the platform team already knows. This page sets Kong Gateway beside Apache APISIX, Envoy Gateway and kgateway, Traefik, Tyk, NGINX and Apigee on licence, Gateway API support, state and who supports it. AceMQ supports Kong and is not a Kong partner, so the page says plainly when staying on Kong is the right call.

Tyler Eastridge

By Tyler Eastridge, Head of Operations

LinkedIn · Updated · 12 min read · 8 sections

15-minute emergency SLA. Named senior engineers.

Contact Us
On this page

Short answer

Short answer

Stay on Kong when your plugins, consumers and Konnect or Enterprise features are doing real work and the licence terms for the version you run are acceptable. Look at the alternatives when you are standardising on the Kubernetes Gateway API (Envoy Gateway, kgateway, Traefik and NGINX Gateway Fabric all appear as conformant on the Gateway API project's implementations page), when you want an Apache-licensed gateway with an independent foundation behind it (Apache APISIX), or when you want a managed API-management product instead of a gateway you operate (Apigee). The first thing to do is check the version you run: Kong's own documentation for Gateway 3.10 says a licence is expected, and free mode is deprecated. The second is to inventory your routes, plugins and consumers, because that inventory sizes every option on this page. AceMQ supports Kong at Tiers 1 to 4 and plans moves to the others; it does not resell Kong or any alternative.

Kong Gateway and seven alternatives on the same criteria (checked 4 November 2026 against vendor and project pages; the last two rows describe AceMQ's own services)

Kong Gateway and seven alternatives on the same criteria (checked 4 November 2026 against vendor and project pages; the last two rows describe AceMQ's own services)
Kong Gateway (baseline)Apache APISIXEnvoy GatewaykgatewayTraefikTykNGINX with Gateway APIApigee
What it isAPI and AI gateway built on NGINX and Lua, with a plugin model, an Admin API and a Kubernetes controller.Apache Software Foundation top-level API gateway with a plugin model and an etcd-backed or standalone control plane.A Gateway API implementation that manages Envoy proxies, from the Envoy project.A Gateway API implementation on Envoy, formerly Gloo, now a CNCF sandbox project.A cloud-native reverse proxy and ingress controller with Gateway API support.An API gateway with a separate dashboard, developer portal and operator.NGINX as a proxy with NGINX Gateway Fabric as the Gateway API implementation.Google Cloud's managed API-management product: proxies, policies, portal and analytics.
LicenceNewer Gateway versions expect a licence: Kong's 3.10 documentation says free mode is deprecated and an unlicensed gateway will behave like one with an expired licence. See the first section for the exact wording.Apache 2.0.Apache 2.0.Apache 2.0; a CNCF sandbox project.MIT, per the project repository. Traefik Labs sells commercial editions.Gateway and Pump under MPL 2.0. The Dashboard, Developer Portal, Operator and Multi Data Center Bridge need a licence key.NGINX is BSD-2-Clause. Commercial NGINX products are sold by F5.Commercial, Google Cloud billing. Quote or consumption terms from Google.
Kubernetes Gateway APIKong Operator is listed as conformant on the Gateway API implementations page.Not on that page's implementations list at our check. Confirm with the project.Listed as conformant.Listed as conformant, and described there as generally available with its 2.0 release.Listed as conformant (Traefik Proxy).Not on that page's implementations list at our check. Confirm with the vendor.NGINX Gateway Fabric is listed as conformant.Not a Gateway API implementation. It is an API-management layer you front or route to.
State and DB-lessDatabase-backed, or DB-less with a single declarative file held in memory. DB-less makes the Admin API read-only, and decK needs a database.etcd in traditional and decoupled modes. Standalone mode reads a YAML or JSON file, or takes rules through an API held in memory.Kubernetes custom resources. No separate database to run.Kubernetes custom resources. No separate database to run.Kubernetes custom resources or file providers. No separate database to run.Needs Redis in production for rate limiting and token storage, per Tyk's documentation.Kubernetes custom resources and NGINX configuration. No separate database.Run by Google Cloud as a managed service. Nothing for you to operate in the default model.
Plugin and policy modelA large plugin catalogue (authentication, rate limiting, transformation, logging). Some plugins are not compatible with DB-less mode.Plugins configured per route, service or globally.Gateway API filters plus Envoy Gateway's own policy resources for authentication, rate limiting and timeouts.Gateway API filters plus kgateway's own policy resources.Middleware resources chained on routes.Middleware and policies in API definitions; richer features sit in the licensed components.Gateway API filters and NGINX modules. Fewer gateway-level policies than a plugin gateway ships.Policies attached to proxies in a managed pipeline.
Who supports itKong Inc. for Gateway Enterprise and Konnect. Community only for the open-source build. AceMQ supports both editions.The community and commercial vendors built on APISIX. Not an AceMQ support page today.The Envoy community and vendors that package it. Not an AceMQ support page today.The kgateway community and its commercial backers. Not an AceMQ support page today.Traefik Labs for commercial editions, community otherwise. Not an AceMQ support page today.Tyk for licensed components, community for the open-source Gateway. Not an AceMQ support page today.F5 for commercial products, community otherwise. Not an AceMQ support page today.Google Cloud. AceMQ supports Apigee estates.
AceMQ's roleSupport at Tier 1 (ticket, 15-minute emergency response) and Tier 2 (monitoring), or operated at Tiers 3 and 4. Independent of Kong.Assessment of a Kong estate against APISIX and migration planning. No APISIX support offer.Route, plugin and consumer assessment against Gateway API resources, and migration planning. No Envoy Gateway support offer.The same assessment and planning. No kgateway support offer.The same assessment and planning. No Traefik support offer.Assessment and migration planning. No Tyk support offer.NGINX support at Tiers 1 and 2, upgrades and Gateway API migration planning (see the NGINX page). Independent of F5.Apigee support and assessment. AceMQ is independent of Google.
Wins whenYour plugins, consumers and Konnect or Enterprise features carry real load and the licence terms suit you.You want an Apache-licensed gateway with a plugin model close to Kong's and an ASF governance route.You want the Gateway API as the interface and Envoy as the data plane.You want Gateway API on Envoy and are comfortable adopting a younger project.You already run Traefik as the ingress and want the gateway to be the same tool.You want a gateway with a portal and are happy to run Redis and buy the licensed components.You already run NGINX widely and your needs are routing, TLS and simple policies.You would rather buy API management as a service than operate a gateway.
Table · Kong Gateway and seven alternatives on the same criteria (checked 4 November 2026 against vendor and project pages; the last two rows describe AceMQ's own services). Scroll sideways on small screens.

What Kong's own documentation says about the licence

The question behind many "Kong alternatives" searches is whether Kong Gateway is still free to run. We looked for a Kong announcement that says its open-source edition has ended and did not find one, so this page does not say that. It quotes what Kong has published, and the dates matter.

  • Kong's breaking-changes page for Gateway 3.10.0.0 says: "Free mode is deprecated and will be removed in a future 3.x version of Kong Gateway Enterprise." and "At that point, running Kong Gateway without a license will behave the same as running it with an expired license."
  • On the Kong community forum, a reply dated 12 March 2026 says: "For Gateway 3.10 and above, you will need to make sure you have a license installed if you do not already." (forum thread)
  • Kong's version support policy lists Gateway Enterprise releases up to 3.16, first released on 15 September 2026, with an LTS supported for three years and a minor version for one.
  • The public Kong/kong releases page shows 3.9.4 as the latest release at our check on 4 November 2026.

Those four facts are consistent with a split between a 3.9 community line and a licensed 3.10-and-later line, but Kong has not said so in anything we read, and we draw no conclusion. The practical advice is narrower: check which Kong Gateway version each environment runs, and ask Kong in writing what the licence terms are for that version. Kong Gateway Enterprise 3.9 also entered its end-of-life phase in January 2026, with a 12-month sunset period that ends in January 2027, per Kong's notice.

Stay on Kong: when it is the right answer

Moving a gateway is a migration of every consumer-facing behaviour, so the bar for leaving should be higher than "the licence question exists". Staying is right when the plugins you use (key authentication, OAuth or OpenID Connect, rate limiting, request transformation) have no cheap equivalent in the alternative, when your teams already know Kong's declarative config and decK workflow, or when you rely on Konnect for a control plane across data centres.

On price, Kong's pricing page (checked 4 November 2026) lists Konnect Plus from $25 per month plus usage, billed monthly, for API Management and AI Management, and says fully self-hosted gateways, where both control plane and data plane run in your estate, are part of its separate Gateway Enterprise offering with custom pricing. Those are list lines, not what a given contract costs.

If you stay and the real problem is who answers at 3 a.m., an independent contract is cheaper than a migration. AceMQ's Kong support covers both Gateway Enterprise and the open-source build on any version, and which companies offer Kong support compares Kong Inc., the community and independent providers.

The Kubernetes Gateway API changes the option set

The Gateway API is the Kubernetes project's successor to Ingress, with Gateway, HTTPRoute and related resources that several data planes implement. The project's implementations page (checked 4 November 2026) lists Envoy Gateway, kgateway, Traefik Proxy, NGINX Gateway Fabric, Istio and Kong Operator as conformant, with kgateway described as generally available with its 2.0 release. Apache APISIX and Tyk were not on that page's list at our check, which does not mean they lack Gateway API support, only that the project's page does not show it.

What this means for a Kong estate: routes and services map to HTTPRoute and backend references reasonably directly. Plugins do not. Authentication, rate limiting and transformation sit outside the core Gateway API in each project's own policy resources, so every Kong plugin you use becomes a decision: find the equivalent policy, move it to another layer (an identity-aware proxy, a service mesh, the application), or drop it. That mapping, not the proxy, is the cost of the move.

Apache APISIX, Tyk and Traefik: the gateway-shaped alternatives

Apache APISIX is an Apache Software Foundation top-level project under Apache 2.0. Its deployment modes are traditional (control and data plane in one instance, config in etcd), decoupled (separate instances, both using etcd) and standalone (no etcd; rules come from a local YAML or JSON file, or live in memory behind an API). That standalone file mode is the closest equivalent to Kong's DB-less mode. Its plugin model is the nearest in shape to Kong's, which makes it the usual shortlist entry for teams that want a similar gateway under a different licence.

Tyk's open-source Gateway and Pump are under MPL 2.0, and its Dashboard, Developer Portal, Operator and Multi Data Center Bridge need a licence key, per Tyk's documentation. It requires Redis in production, which is one more stateful service to run highly available. Do not call Tyk fully open source: the open core and the licensed components are different products.

Traefik is MIT-licensed per its repository and strongest as an ingress that grew gateway features. It fits a team that already routes with Traefik and needs fewer API-management features than Kong's plugin catalogue provides.

15-minute emergency SLA. Named senior engineers.

Contact Us

Envoy Gateway, kgateway, NGINX and Apigee

Envoy Gateway (Apache 2.0) and kgateway (Apache 2.0, formerly Gloo, a CNCF sandbox project) put Envoy behind the Gateway API. They suit platform teams that want Kubernetes-native config in Git and are comfortable replacing plugin-by-plugin behaviour with policy resources. NGINX is BSD-2-Clause, and NGINX Gateway Fabric is its Gateway API implementation; it fits estates that already operate NGINX widely and need routing, TLS and simple policies rather than a plugin ecosystem. AceMQ supports NGINX and plans moves off the retired Ingress NGINX controller; see NGINX services and Ingress NGINX migration.

Apigee is a different shape of answer: managed API management from Google Cloud, with proxies, policies, a developer portal and analytics, instead of a gateway you operate. It trades control and portability for not running the platform. AceMQ supports Apigee estates; see Apigee consulting and support.

What has to be mapped when you leave Kong

Every option above needs the same inventory first. If you run Kong with a database, export it; if you run DB-less, the declarative file already is the inventory, and Kong's DB-less documentation notes that each load replaces the whole configuration. List:

  1. Services and routes: hosts, paths, methods, header matches, strip-path and regex routes. Regex routes are where Gateway API HTTPRoute matching differs most.
  2. Plugins, global and scoped, with the order they run in. Mark each as authentication, traffic control, transformation, observability or custom Lua. Custom Lua plugins are rewrites in every alternative.
  3. Consumers and credentials: key-auth keys, JWT secrets, OAuth clients. These are secrets, so the move needs a rotation plan, not a copy.
  4. Upstreams and health checks: active and passive checks, retries and timeouts, which differ in default behaviour between proxies.
  5. Certificates, SNI and mTLS settings.
  6. Where state lives: Postgres, DB-less file, Konnect. This decides whether the target needs etcd, Redis or nothing.

Run the new gateway beside Kong on mirrored or shadowed traffic, compare response codes and latency per route, and move consumers route by route. AceMQ's gateway work is this assessment and plan; see Kong consulting.

Who should not move off Kong

Stay if your estate is a handful of services behind Kong with standard plugins and the only driver is a headline. Stay if your team has no Kubernetes platform capacity: Gateway API implementations assume you run controllers and custom resources well. Stay if you hold a Kong Enterprise or Konnect agreement you use fully. Move, or at least price a move, if you have standardised on Gateway API across clusters, if licence terms for the Kong version you need do not fit your policy, or if one alternative already runs in your cluster and doing the work twice is the real cost.

How we compared, and sources checked

We compared options on licence, Gateway API conformance, state, plugin model and support route, using the vendors' and projects' own pages. Prices are list lines with a date; none are quotes. All checked 4 November 2026: Kong breaking changes, Kong version support policy, Kong pricing, Kong DB-less mode, Gateway API implementations, APISIX deployment modes, Tyk open-source Gateway, and the licence files of Envoy Gateway, kgateway and Tyk. AceMQ is not a Kong, Tyk, Traefik, F5, Google or Apache partner or reseller. Vendor pages change; re-check anything you plan to rely on.

Frequently asked questions

Is Kong Gateway still open source?

We found no Kong statement saying its open-source edition has ended, so we do not say that. Kong's documentation for Gateway 3.10 says free mode is deprecated and that running without a licence will behave like an expired licence, and a reply on Kong's community forum says Gateway 3.10 and above need a licence installed. The public Kong/kong releases page showed 3.9.4 as the latest release on 4 November 2026. Check the version you run and ask Kong in writing.

What are the best alternatives to Kong API Gateway?

For a similar plugin gateway, Apache APISIX (Apache 2.0) and Tyk (open-source Gateway under MPL 2.0, licensed components separate) are the usual shortlist. For Kubernetes-native routing on the Gateway API, Envoy Gateway, kgateway, Traefik and NGINX Gateway Fabric are listed as conformant. For managed API management, Apigee. The right one depends on which Kong plugins you use.

Do I need a licence to run Kong Gateway?

For Gateway 3.10 and above, a reply on Kong's community forum says you need a licence installed, and Kong's documentation says free mode is deprecated. Earlier community releases such as 3.9.x are on the public releases page. Version support also matters: Kong Gateway Enterprise 3.9 entered end of life in January 2026 with a sunset period to January 2027.

Can I replace Kong plugins with the Kubernetes Gateway API?

Only partly. The Gateway API covers routing, TLS, header and path matching and basic filters. Authentication, rate limiting and body transformation live in each implementation's own policy resources, in another layer such as a mesh or identity proxy, or in the application. Treat every Kong plugin as a separate mapping decision.

Does AceMQ support Kong, and does it sell Kong licences?

AceMQ supports Kong Gateway Enterprise and the open-source build, 24/7, with a 15-minute emergency response, and can operate it at Tiers 3 and 4. AceMQ is independent of Kong, does not resell Kong licences and gives no vendor licensing advice. For the alternatives on this page, AceMQ offers assessment and migration planning; support depends on the technology.

Support services

Where this gets done

The work behind this page, run by the same engineers who wrote it.

Free Consultation

Get Expert Eyes on Your Support Environment

Whether you're troubleshooting a production incident, planning a migration, or want a second opinion on your architecture — our team is ready. No pitch, just answers.

Email Us